J Med Life Sci > Volume 20(4); 2023 > Article
Kim: Predictors of outcomes after the trans-obturator tape procedure in females with equal severity for stress and urge mixed urinary incontinence

Abstract

Mixed urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of anti-incontinence surgery in female patients with equally severe stress UI (SUI) and urge UI (UUI). All patients had equal severity of SUI and UUI. The postoperative cure rate was categorized into the cure group (CG) and failure group (FG). Postoperative satisfaction was categorized into the satisfaction group (SG) and the dissatisfaction group (DG). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Ninety patients (SG, 73.3%; DG, 26.7%; CG, 93.3%; FG, 6.7%) were included in the study. In the univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), total bladder capacity, and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) were significantly different between the SG and DG groups. Peak urinary flow, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and OABSS were significantly different between the CG and FG groups. In the multivariate analysis, OABSS (P=0.001) and BMI (P=0.032) were independent predictors of postoperative satisfaction. VLPP (P=0.023) was the only independent factor associated with the postoperative cure rate. In equal severity of SUI and UUI, VLPP was found to be the only independent factor associated with postoperative cure rates. Higher VLPP values were associated with higher cure rates. BMI and OABSS were identified as independent predictors of postoperative satisfaction, with lower BMI and OABSS associated with higher postoperative satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION

Mixed urinary incontinence (UI) is characterized by a combination of stress UI (SUI) and symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB), according to the definition provided by the International Continence Society [1]. Mixed UI can manifest with varying degrees of stress and urge predominance. Optimized and standardized approaches for the treatment of mixed UI are currently lacking. Furthermore, the factors that exclusively predict the postoperative outcomes of mixed UI remain unclear. Mixed UI often presents with diverse clinical features, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation that includes medical history assessment, physical examination, imaging studies, and urodynamic assessments to achieve an accurate diagnosis. By elucidating the risk factors that influence the success rate of mixed UI, which generally demonstrates a lower success rate than pure SUI, the treatment outcomes can be optimized and comprehensive guidance provided to patients considering surgical intervention. Therefore, the objective of our study was to identify the predictive clinical factors associated with the postoperative cure rate and satisfaction in female patients with equal severity of SUI and urge UI (UUI).

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Jeju National University (JEJUNUH 2017-01-006). Between January 2010 and April 2022, 532 patients with mixed UI underwent urodynamic studies using a standardized protocol (Fig. 1) [2]. All patients were categorized as having an equal severity of SUI and UUI based on the urinary symptom scores obtained from the King’s health questionnaire (KHQ) [3]. Among them, 90 patients diagnosed with equal severity SUI and UUI underwent trans-obturator tape (TOT) at a single center. Patients with stress- or urge-predominant mixed UI were excluded. The study also excluded patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and other complications (neurogenic bladder, comorbidities such as multiple sclerosis or diabetes, concurrent surgeries, or uterovaginal prolapse). The patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after TOT, during which no additional anticholinergic agents were administered for the management of urge symptoms. We analyzed the cure rate and satisfaction by evaluating patients’ perceived satisfaction and changes in symptoms after undergoing the TOT procedure. The postoperative cure rate was categorized into three groups: cure, improvement, and failure [4]. Additionally, the postoperative cure status was divided into the cure group (CG), including patients with cure and improvement, and the failure group (FG) for patients who did not experience significant improvement. Postoperative satisfaction was classified into four groups: very satisfied, satisfied, no change, and dissatisfied. Furthermore, postoperative satisfaction was divided into the satisfaction group (patients who reported being very satisfied or satisfied, SG) and the dissatisfaction group (patients who reported no change or dissatisfied, DG). All patients underwent a comprehensive examination, a full urodynamic study, documentation of a 3-day voiding chart, and scoring of the symptoms section of the KHQ. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test or Student’s t-test for categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors affecting postoperative outcomes, and independent risk factors were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULT

Based on postoperative subjective satisfaction, 66 patients (73.3%) were classified in the SG and 24 patients (26.7%) in the DG. Regarding the postoperative cure rate, 84 patients (93.3%) were classified in the CG, while six patients (6.7%) were in the FG. The mean age of the patients was 55.4±1.1 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 26.3±0.3 kg/m2. The mean values of urodynamic parameters were as follows: bladder capacity, 337.1±12.5 mL; detrusor pressure at peak urinary flow (Pdetmax), 36.7±1.3 cmH2O; Qmax, 18.8±0.8 mL/s; residual urine (RU), 23.1±4.6 mL; maximal urethral closing pressure (MUCP), 29.6±1.2 cmH2O; Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), 72.6±2.9 cmH2O (Table 1). There were significant differences between the SG and DG in terms of VLPP (P=0.041), BMI (P=0.028), and OAB symptom score (OABSS, P<0.001) (Table 2). Similarly, significant differences were observed between the CG and FG in VLPP (P=0.011) and OABSS (P<0.001) (Table 3). Univariate analysis revealed that BMI, total capacity, and OABSS were associated with postoperative satisfaction, while VLPP and OABSS were related to the postoperative cure rate. In the multivariate analysis, OABSS (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.150; P=0.001) and BMI (adjusted OR, 0.860; P=0.032) were identified as independent predictors of postoperative satisfaction, whereas VLPP (adjusted OR, 1.047; P=0.023) was the only independent predictor for the postoperative cure rate (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

Mixed UI is characterized by complaints of involuntary urinary incontinence combined with urgency and abdominal pressure. However, there are currently no established treatment guidelines for mixed UI. The differentiation between stress- and urge-predominant mixed UI is primarily based on patient symptoms. Consequently, definitive anti-incontinence treatments have not been established for the management of mixed UI. The primary focus is on initially addressing the most bothersome symptoms [5]. Mixed UI is a common form of UI. However, definitive indicators for quantifying the dominance of stress or urge components in mixed UI are lacking. This differentiation is particularly important because patients with mixed UI often present with more uncomfortable symptoms than those with SUI or UUI alone [6]. Therefore, there is a need to prioritize the treatment of the predominant symptoms in mixed UI [7]. Currently, the assessment of stress and urge severity in patients with mixed UI relies on subjective measures such as the urinary symptom section of the KHQ. In our study, all patients were diagnosed with urodynamic mixed UI and were selected based on equal severity of stress and urge symptoms using the Korean version of the KHQ. Most mixed UI patients had more than 50% of patients with mixed UI exhibited an unequal predominance of SUI and UUI. An equal severity of stress and urge UI was smaller [8]. Our aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction and cure rates after surgery, specifically focusing on minimizing differences in predominant symptoms to obtain fairer and more informative results. Previous reports have indicated that 50-74% of patients with mixed UI achieve complete recovery after anti-incontinence surgery alone [9]. A systematic meta-analysis of mid-urethral slings in patients with mixed UI reported an overall subjective cure rate of 56% [10]. Success rates after mid-urethral slings varied depending on the degree of UUI [11]. To minimize the differentiation of outcomes according to symptom severity, we focused on equal severity of SUI and UUI in our study. The postoperative satisfaction and cure rates were 73.3% and 93.3%, respectively. In one study, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery demonstrated an 85% cure rate for both stress and urge factors in mixed UI, with only an 11% failure rate, indicating the effectiveness of TVT in treating mixed UI [12]. It has been reported that anti-incontinence surgery can achieve a complete cure for both stress and urge components in 50-77.5% of mixed UI cases, except for severe urge-predominant cases, compared to that of SUI [13]. However, the cure rate for mixed UI is not as high as that for SUI. The satisfaction rate after transobturator TVT (TVT-O) for mixed UI was approximately 62.8% [14]. In our study, the postoperative satisfaction rate was 73.3% and the cure rate was 93.3% for patients with equal severity of stress and urge symptoms in urodynamic mixed UI. Regarding BMI, no significant differences were observed in the subjective cure rates [15]. However, our data showed that BMI and OABSS had an impact on postoperative satisfaction according to multivariate analysis. Significantly higher postoperative satisfaction rates were found in patients with normal BMI than in obese individuals (P=0.008) and in patients with mild OABSS symptoms than in those with severe symptoms (P<0.001). In a previous study, VLPP was not identified as a significant predictive factor for the cure rate following sling surgery [16]. However, in our study, a significant difference in the postoperative cure rate was noted between patients with VLPP ranging from 60 to 90 cmH2O (P=0.001). Another study found no significant predictive factors for mixed UI after TVT surgery [17]. The authors’ research indicated that a higher VLPP was associated with higher postoperative cure rates, while lower BMI and OABSS were associated with higher postoperative satisfaction. Moreover, mixed UI can manifest with varying degrees of stress and urge. Therefore, to minimize differences in postoperative outcomes, we specifically focused on patients with equal severity of SUI and UUI in our study. By identifying the predictive factors that influence the success rate of mixed UI, which has a relatively lower success rate than pure SUI, we can achieve optimal treatment outcomes and provide valuable counseling to patients considering surgery. This study aimed to investigate these predictive factors and their impact on treatment outcomes in patients with mixed UI, contributing to the advancement of clinical practice and enhancing patient care.
This study has three main limitations. The first was the small number of participants. Second, we were unable to identify all possible factors. Finally, this design excludes the possibility of residual confounding factors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2023 education, research, and student guidance grant funded by the Jeju National University

Figure 1.
A flow diagram of the selected patients. UUI: urge UI, SUI: stress UI.
jmls-2023-20-4-166f1.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of studied patients
Parameter Value
Age (years) 55.4±1.1
BMI (kg/m2) 26.3±0.3
Weight (kg) 62.8±1.1
Bladder capacity (mL) 337.1±12.5
Pdetmax (cmH2O) 36.7±1.3
Residual urine (mL) 26.1±4.6
Qmax (mL/s) 18.8±0.8
MCUP (cmH2O) 29.6±1.2
VLPP (cmH2O) 72.6±2.9
OABSS (sum) 11.7±5.1

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

BMI: body mass index, Pdetmax: detrusor pressure at peak urinary flow, Qmax: peak urinary flow, MCUP: maximal urethral closing pressure, VLPP: Valsalva leak point pressure, OABSS: overactive bladder symptom score.

Table 2.
Comparison of clinical parameters between SG and DG in postoperative satisfaction
Parameter DG (n=24) SG (n=66) P-value
Age (years) 54.5±9.8 55.8±9.7 0.598
Qmax (mL/s) 19.1±11.1 18.7±6.9 0.874
Pdetmax (cmH2O) 35.7±13.5 37.1±13.2 0.664
Residual urine (mL) 33.4±9.1 23.4±5.4 0.340
MUCP (cmH2O) 27.3±13.6 30.4±9.9 0.227
VLPP (cmH2O) 62.7±23.2 76.3±23.2 0.041*
Bladder capacity (mL) 339.2±88.2 336.3±128.9 0.918
Weight (kg) 65.2±10.5 62.1±9.4 0.171
BMI (kg/m2) 27.5±3.2 25.8±3.2 0.028*
OABSS 17.6±1.7 9.5±4.1 <0.001*

Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.

DG: dissatisfaction group, SG: satisfaction group, Qmax: peak urinary flow, Pdetmax: detrusor pressure at peak urinary flow, MCUP: maximal urethral closing pressure, VLPP: Valsalva leak point pressure, BMI: body mass index, OABSS: overactive bladder symptom score.

* Statistically significant.

Table 3.
Comparison of clinical parameters between FG and CG in postoperative success
Parameter FG (n=6) CG (n=84) P-value
Age (years) 57.5±14.6 55.3±9.4 0.604
Qmax (mL/s) 17.6±0.6 18.9±8.4 0.714
Pdetmax (cmH2O) 38.1±2.2 36.6±13.7 0.815
Residual urine (mL) 26.2±6.6 26.1±5.3 0.997
MUCP (cmH2O) 20.3±9.2 30.3±11.2 0.326
VLPP (cmH2O) 45.7±16.4 74.6±27.5 0.011*
Bladder capacity (mL) 300.3±21.9 339.7±122.8 0.432
Weight (kg) 62.6±15.1 62.7±9.3 0.482
BMI (kg/m2) 27.5±2.7 26.3±3.7 0.409
OABSS 18.6±1.7 10.1±4.8 <0.001*

Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.

FG: failure group, CG: cure group, Qmax: peak urinary flow, Pdetmax: detrusor pressure at peak urinary flow, MCUP: maximal urethral closing pressure, VLPP: valsalva leak point pressure, BMI: body mass index, OABSS: overactive bladder symptom score.

* Statistically significant.

Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate analysis for predictors of cure and satisfaction in mixed UI with equal severity for stress and urge
Variable OR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) P-value
Satisfaction
 BMI 0.554 (0.316-0.971) 0.039* 0.860 (0.749-0.987) 0.032*
 Capacity 0.972 (0.946-0.999) 0.044* 1.000 (0.996-1.004) 0.917
 OABSS 0.033 (0.002-0.453) 0.011* 0.150 (0.047-0.477) 0.001*
Cure
 VLPP 1.074 (0.963-1.199) 0.030* 1.047 (1.007-1.090) 0.023*
 OABSS 0.170 (0.012-2.390) 0.019* 0.399 (0.129-1.232) 0.110*

UI: urinary incontinence, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, BMI: body mass index, OABSS: overactive bladder symptom score, VLPP: Valsalva leak point pressure.

* Statistically significant <0.05.

REFERENCES

1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-78.
crossref pmid
2. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Salvatore S. Overactive bladder symptoms: do we need urodynamics? Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:105-8.
crossref pmid
3. Oh SJ, Park HG, Paick SH, Park WH, Choo MS. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of the King’s health questionnaire instrument. Korean J Urol 2005;46:438-50.
4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003;61:37-49.
crossref pmid
5. Dmochowski R, Staskin D. Mixed incontinence: definitions, outcomes, and interventions. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:374-9.
crossref pmid
6. Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Vanvik A, Bratt H, Seim A, Hermstad R. Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: an epidemiological survey corrected for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:339-43.
crossref pmid
7. Lewis JB, Ng AV, O’Connor RC, Guralnick ML. Are there differences between women with urge predominant and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence? Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:204-7.
crossref pmid
8. Digesu GA, Salvatore S, Fernando R, Khullar V. Mixed urinary symptoms: what are the urodynamic findings? Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:372-5.
crossref pmid
9. Anger J, Rodríguez LV. Mixed incontinence: stressing about urge. Curr Urol Rep 2004;5:427-31.
crossref pmid pdf
10. Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:923-32.
crossref pmid pdf
11. Myers DL. Female mixed urinary incontinence: a clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:2007-14.
crossref pmid
12. Rezapour M, Ulmsten U. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with mixed urinary incontinence--a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12(Suppl 2):S15-8.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Kim JJ, Bae JH, Lee JG. Preoperative factors predicting the outcome of a midurethal sling operation for treating women with mixed incontinence. Korean J Urol 2008;49:1112-8.
crossref
14. Juang CM, Yu KJ, Chou P, Yen MS, Twu NF, Horng HC, et al. Efficacy analysis of trans-obturator tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O) plus modified Ingelman-Sundberg procedure versus TVT-O alone in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence: a randomized study. Eur Urol 2007 51:1671-8. discussion 1679.
crossref pmid
15. Rafii A, Daraï E, Haab F, Samain E, Levardon M, Deval B. Body mass index and outcome of tension-free vaginal tape. Eur Urol 2003;43:288-92.
crossref pmid
16. Rodríguez LV, de Almeida F, Dorey F, Raz S. Does Valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal urethral polypropylene sling? Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol 2004;172:210-4.
crossref pmid
17. Segal JL, Vassallo B, Kleeman S, Silva WA, Karram MM. Prevalence of persistent and de novo overactive bladder symptoms after the tension-free vaginal tape. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1263-9.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 393 View
  • 11 Download
ORCID iDs

Young-Joo Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-4338

Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
102, Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si, Jeju-do 63243, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-64-754-8023    E-mail: jmls.jeju@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Jeju National University Institute for Medical Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next